Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs LMOFX
FSMDX vs LMOFX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs LMOFX
FSMDX vs LMOFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. LMOFX commentary
Jun 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and LMOFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 40.4B vs. LMOFX (1.54B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than LMOFX: FSMDX (1.14) vs LMOFX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than LMOFX: FSMDX (14 years) vs LMOFX (21 years). LMOFX (1.83) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). LMOFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX (0) and LMOFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LMOFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.21 vs. FSMDX (10.78). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 71.17 vs. LMOFX (49.63).
| FSMDX | LMOFX | FSMDX / LMOFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.82 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.83 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.014 | 1.497 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.4B | 1.54B | 2,623% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.78 | 16.21 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.12 | 50.70 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.17 | 49.63 | 143% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.23 | 81.12 | 132% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement