Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs LMOFX
FSMDX vs LMOFX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs LMOFX
FSMDX vs LMOFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. LMOFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and LMOFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. LMOFX (2.05B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than LMOFX: FSMDX (0.75) vs LMOFX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than LMOFX: FSMDX (15 years) vs LMOFX (23 years). LMOFX (1.74) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). LMOFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and LMOFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LMOFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.74 vs. FSMDX (13.26). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. LMOFX (29.54).
| FSMDX | LMOFX | FSMDX / LMOFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.74 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.74 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.837 | 13.588 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 2.05B | 2,585% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.26 | 17.74 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.18 | 106.56 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.31 | 29.54 | 136% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.00 | 211.70 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement