Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs LMREX
FSMDX vs LMREX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs LMREX
FSMDX vs LMREX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. LMREX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and LMREX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 40.4B vs. LMREX (1.63B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than LMREX: FSMDX (1.14) vs LMREX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than LMREX: FSMDX (14 years) vs LMREX (17 years). LMREX (1.46) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). LMREX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX (0) and LMREX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.03 vs. LMREX (-0.57). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 73.33 vs. LMREX (9.77).
| FSMDX | LMREX | FSMDX / LMREX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.45 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.46 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.421 | -0.907 | -157% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.4B | 1.63B | 2,486% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.03 | -0.57 | -1,775% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.08 | 6.03 | 698% |
| Returns for 5 years | 73.33 | 9.77 | 750% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.65 | -0.78 | -13,878% |