Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs LMREX
FSMDX vs LMREX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs LMREX
FSMDX vs LMREX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. LMREX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and LMREX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. LMREX (1.44B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than LMREX: FSMDX (0.75) vs LMREX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than LMREX: FSMDX (15 years) vs LMREX (18 years). LMREX (1.46) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). LMREX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and LMREX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.26 vs. LMREX (-11.40). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. LMREX (-28.59).
| FSMDX | LMREX | FSMDX / LMREX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.45 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.46 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.837 | 0.593 | 2,335% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 1.44B | 3,677% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.26 | -11.40 | -116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.18 | 0.36 | 15,547% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.31 | -28.59 | -141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.00 | 6.28 | 2,658% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers