Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs LMREX
FSMDX vs LMREX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs LMREX
FSMDX vs LMREX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. LMREX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and LMREX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. LMREX (1.54B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than LMREX: FSMDX (0.99) vs LMREX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than LMREX: FSMDX (15 years) vs LMREX (18 years). LMREX (1.46) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). LMREX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and LMREX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.95 vs. LMREX (-1.44). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 43.87 vs. LMREX (-23.77).
| FSMDX | LMREX | FSMDX / LMREX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.45 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.46 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.431 | 3.490 | 385% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 1.54B | 3,351% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.95 | -1.44 | -1,591% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.87 | 6.36 | 941% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.87 | -23.77 | -185% |
| Returns for 10 years | 178.20 | 15.32 | 1,164% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement