Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs LSIRX
FSMDX vs LSIRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs LSIRX
FSMDX vs LSIRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. LSIRX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and LSIRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 40.4B vs. LSIRX (1.65B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than LSIRX: FSMDX (1.14) vs LSIRX (0.37). FSMDX was incepted earlier than LSIRX: FSMDX (14 years) vs LSIRX (17 years). LSIRX (0.76) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). LSIRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSIRX: FSMDX (0) vs LSIRX (1000000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.60 vs. LSIRX (5.09). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 79.09 vs. LSIRX (25.38).
| FSMDX | LSIRX | FSMDX / LSIRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.75 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.76 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.198 | 1.543 | 207% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.4B | 1.65B | 2,444% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 0.37 | 312% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.60 | 5.09 | 248% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.70 | 9.33 | 436% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.09 | 25.38 | 312% |
| Returns for 10 years | 116.87 | 21.31 | 548% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement