Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs LSIRX
FSMDX vs LSIRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs LSIRX
FSMDX vs LSIRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. LSIRX commentary
Jun 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and LSIRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. LSIRX (1.52B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than LSIRX: FSMDX (0.99) vs LSIRX (0.26). FSMDX was incepted earlier than LSIRX: FSMDX (15 years) vs LSIRX (18 years). LSIRX (0.76) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). LSIRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSIRX: FSMDX (0) vs LSIRX (1000000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.80 vs. LSIRX (-0.91). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.22 vs. LSIRX (-17.50).
| FSMDX | LSIRX | FSMDX / LSIRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.75 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.76 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.481 | 2.313 | 496% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 1.52B | 3,388% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.26 | 380% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.80 | -0.91 | -2,176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.99 | 12.09 | 471% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.22 | -17.50 | -230% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.84 | 29.92 | 558% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement