Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs LVORX
FSMDX vs LVORX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs LVORX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$36.58
Change+$0.22 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.38B
Lord Abbett Value Opportunities R3
Price$17.65
Change+$0.14 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
FSMDX vs LVORX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. LVORX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and LVORX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 42.4B vs. LVORX (1.13B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than LVORX: FSMDX (1.31) vs LVORX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than LVORX: FSMDX (14 years) vs LVORX (18 years). LVORX (1.44) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). LVORX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and LVORX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.51 vs. LVORX (-5.35). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 74.34 vs. LVORX (9.99).
| FSMDX | LVORX | FSMDX / LVORX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.44 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.44 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.931 | -1.629 | -487% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.4B | 1.13B | 3,749% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.51 | -5.35 | -271% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.57 | 7.03 | 648% |
| Returns for 5 years | 74.34 | 9.99 | 744% |
| Returns for 10 years | 126.81 | -11.06 | -1,146% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement