Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs LVORX
FSMDX vs LVORX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs LVORX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$37.46
Change+$0.11 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.37B
Lord Abbett Value Opportunities R3
Price$17.91
Change+$0.07 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
FSMDX vs LVORX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. LVORX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and LVORX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 45.4B vs. LVORX (1.13B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than LVORX: FSMDX (1.25) vs LVORX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than LVORX: FSMDX (14 years) vs LVORX (18 years). LVORX (1.44) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). LVORX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and LVORX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.82 vs. LVORX (-5.59). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 71.97 vs. LVORX (9.94).
| FSMDX | LVORX | FSMDX / LVORX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.44 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.44 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.196 | 0.618 | 1,812% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.4B | 1.13B | 4,025% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.82 | -5.59 | -212% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.02 | 13.35 | 390% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.97 | 9.94 | 724% |
| Returns for 10 years | 145.92 | -4.68 | -3,119% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement