Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs MCSPX
FSMDX vs MCSPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs MCSPX
FSMDX vs MCSPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. MCSPX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and MCSPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. MCSPX (930M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than MCSPX: FSMDX (0.99) vs MCSPX (0.70). FSMDX was incepted earlier than MCSPX: FSMDX (15 years) vs MCSPX (32 years). MCSPX (1.89) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). MCSPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 115.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCSPX: FSMDX (0) vs MCSPX (1000). FSMDX (22.14) and MCSPX (21.58) have marching annual gain over last year. FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 43.00 vs. MCSPX (16.80).
| FSMDX | MCSPX | FSMDX / MCSPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.48 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.89 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.781 | 20.863 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 930M | 5,538% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.70 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.14 | 21.58 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.47 | 48.15 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.00 | 16.80 | 256% |
| Returns for 10 years | 168.57 | -32.25 | -523% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers