Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs MCSPX
FSMDX vs MCSPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs MCSPX
FSMDX vs MCSPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. MCSPX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and MCSPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. MCSPX (1.03B). MCSPX (0.76) and FSMDX (0.75) have matching dividends . FSMDX was incepted earlier than MCSPX: FSMDX (15 years) vs MCSPX (32 years). MCSPX (1.91) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). MCSPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCSPX: FSMDX (0) vs MCSPX (1000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.26 vs. MCSPX (10.14). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. MCSPX (10.03).
| FSMDX | MCSPX | FSMDX / MCSPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.48 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.91 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.837 | 14.394 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 1.03B | 5,160% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.76 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.26 | 10.14 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.18 | 34.90 | 161% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.31 | 10.03 | 402% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.00 | -38.56 | -433% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement