Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs MKSPX
FSMDX vs MKSPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs MKSPX
FSMDX vs MKSPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. MKSPX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and MKSPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. MKSPX (1.03B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than MKSPX: FSMDX (0.75) vs MKSPX (0.58). FSMDX was incepted earlier than MKSPX: FSMDX (15 years) vs MKSPX (9 years). MKSPX (0.64) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). MKSPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than MKSPX: FSMDX (0) vs MKSPX (5000000). MKSPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.36 vs. FSMDX (13.26). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. MKSPX (37.00).
| FSMDX | MKSPX | FSMDX / MKSPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.43 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.64 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.837 | 18.705 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 1.03B | 5,160% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.58 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.26 | 18.36 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.18 | 55.67 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.31 | 37.00 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.00 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers