Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs MMCRX
FSMDX vs MMCRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs MMCRX
FSMDX vs MMCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. MMCRX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and MMCRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. MMCRX (1.61B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than MMCRX: FSMDX (0.75) vs MMCRX (0.48). FSMDX was incepted earlier than MMCRX: FSMDX (15 years) vs MMCRX (15 years). MMCRX (0.72) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). MMCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than MMCRX: FSMDX (0) vs MMCRX (500000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.26 vs. MMCRX (-2.44). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. MMCRX (21.13).
| FSMDX | MMCRX | FSMDX / MMCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.72 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.72 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.837 | 3.434 | 403% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 1.61B | 3,306% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.48 | 154% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.26 | -2.44 | -544% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.18 | 18.28 | 307% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.31 | 21.13 | 191% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.00 | 98.13 | 170% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement