Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs MMCRX
FSMDX vs MMCRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs MMCRX
FSMDX vs MMCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. MMCRX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and MMCRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. MMCRX (1.65B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than MMCRX: FSMDX (0.99) vs MMCRX (0.53). FSMDX was incepted earlier than MMCRX: FSMDX (15 years) vs MMCRX (14 years). MMCRX (0.72) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). MMCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than MMCRX: FSMDX (0) vs MMCRX (500000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.46 vs. MMCRX (-1.35). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 42.72 vs. MMCRX (20.10).
| FSMDX | MMCRX | FSMDX / MMCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.72 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.72 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.996 | -1.205 | -996% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 1.65B | 3,114% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.53 | 185% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.46 | -1.35 | -1,666% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.36 | 22.42 | 265% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.72 | 20.10 | 213% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.70 | 90.97 | 183% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement