Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs MMCRX
FSMDX vs MMCRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs MMCRX
FSMDX vs MMCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. MMCRX commentary
Aug 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and MMCRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 52.1B vs. MMCRX (1.73B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than MMCRX: FSMDX (0.76) vs MMCRX (0.49). FSMDX was incepted earlier than MMCRX: FSMDX (15 years) vs MMCRX (14 years). MMCRX (0.72) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). MMCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than MMCRX: FSMDX (0) vs MMCRX (500000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.35 vs. MMCRX (6.95). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 47.68 vs. MMCRX (26.60).
| FSMDX | MMCRX | FSMDX / MMCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.72 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.72 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.038 | 10.120 | 198% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.1B | 1.73B | 3,012% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.49 | 156% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.35 | 6.95 | 336% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.51 | 25.16 | 252% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.68 | 26.60 | 179% |
| Returns for 10 years | 174.76 | 108.12 | 162% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers