Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs MXBUX
FSMDX vs MXBUX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs MXBUX
FSMDX vs MXBUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. MXBUX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and MXBUX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. MXBUX (1.64B). MXBUX pays higher dividends than FSMDX: MXBUX (2.61) vs FSMDX (0.99). FSMDX was incepted earlier than MXBUX: FSMDX (15 years) vs MXBUX (9 years). MXBUX (0.82) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). MXBUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and MXBUX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.46 vs. MXBUX (10.88). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 42.72 vs. MXBUX (-5.54).
| FSMDX | MXBUX | FSMDX / MXBUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.80 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.82 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.996 | 12.814 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 1.64B | 3,146% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 2.61 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.46 | 10.88 | 206% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.36 | 17.28 | 344% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.72 | -5.54 | -771% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.70 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers