Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs MXBUX
FSMDX vs MXBUX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs MXBUX
FSMDX vs MXBUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. MXBUX commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and MXBUX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. MXBUX (1.59B). MXBUX pays higher dividends than FSMDX: MXBUX (2.58) vs FSMDX (0.75). FSMDX was incepted earlier than MXBUX: FSMDX (15 years) vs MXBUX (9 years). MXBUX (0.82) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). MXBUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and MXBUX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.86 vs. MXBUX (-1.78). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.93 vs. MXBUX (-5.38).
| FSMDX | MXBUX | FSMDX / MXBUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.80 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.82 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.945 | 10.010 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 1.59B | 3,344% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 2.58 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.86 | -1.78 | -780% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.80 | 13.09 | 442% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.93 | -5.38 | -761% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.73 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers