Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs MXMDX
FSMDX vs MXMDX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs MXMDX
FSMDX vs MXMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. MXMDX commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and MXMDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. MXMDX (1.59B). MXMDX pays higher dividends than FSMDX: MXMDX (1.24) vs FSMDX (0.75). FSMDX was incepted earlier than MXMDX: FSMDX (15 years) vs MXMDX (16 years). MXMDX (0.54) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). MXMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and MXMDX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.86 vs. MXMDX (6.02). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.93 vs. MXMDX (19.37).
| FSMDX | MXMDX | FSMDX / MXMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.54 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.54 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.945 | 10.942 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 1.59B | 3,344% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 1.24 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.86 | 6.02 | 230% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.80 | 31.80 | 182% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.93 | 19.37 | 211% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.73 | 72.54 | 228% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers