Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs MXNZX
FSMDX vs MXNZX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs MXNZX
FSMDX vs MXNZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. MXNZX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and MXNZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. MXNZX (1.64B). MXNZX pays higher dividends than FSMDX: MXNZX (4.81) vs FSMDX (0.99). FSMDX was incepted earlier than MXNZX: FSMDX (15 years) vs MXNZX (11 years). MXNZX (0.19) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). MXNZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and MXNZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.46 vs. MXNZX (9.74). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 42.72 vs. MXNZX (-6.47).
| FSMDX | MXNZX | FSMDX / MXNZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.19 | 13% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.19 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.996 | 13.151 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 1.64B | 3,146% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 4.81 | 20% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.46 | 9.74 | 231% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.36 | 16.00 | 371% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.72 | -6.47 | -660% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.70 | 19.00 | 878% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement