Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs MXNZX
FSMDX vs MXNZX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs MXNZX
FSMDX vs MXNZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. MXNZX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and MXNZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. MXNZX (1.67B). MXNZX pays higher dividends than FSMDX: MXNZX (4.81) vs FSMDX (0.99). FSMDX was incepted earlier than MXNZX: FSMDX (15 years) vs MXNZX (11 years). MXNZX (0.19) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). MXNZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and MXNZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.60 vs. MXNZX (10.61). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 43.56 vs. MXNZX (-3.34).
| FSMDX | MXNZX | FSMDX / MXNZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.19 | 13% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.19 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.027 | 15.342 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 1.67B | 3,089% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 4.81 | 20% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.60 | 10.61 | 213% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.71 | 17.90 | 339% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.56 | -3.34 | -1,304% |
| Returns for 10 years | 179.66 | 24.85 | 723% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers