Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs NMPAX
FSMDX vs NMPAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs NMPAX
Columbia Mid Cap Index Inst
Price$14.06
Change+$0.19 (+1.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.47B
FSMDX vs NMPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. NMPAX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and NMPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 40.4B vs. NMPAX (2.47B). NMPAX pays higher dividends than FSMDX: NMPAX (1.41) vs FSMDX (1.14). FSMDX was incepted earlier than NMPAX: FSMDX (14 years) vs NMPAX (25 years). NMPAX (0.34) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). NMPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMPAX: FSMDX (0) vs NMPAX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.60 vs. NMPAX (-2.86). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 79.09 vs. NMPAX (14.73).
| FSMDX | NMPAX | FSMDX / NMPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.20 | 13% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.34 | 7% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.198 | -4.191 | -76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.4B | 2.47B | 1,638% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 1.41 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.60 | -2.86 | -441% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.70 | 7.84 | 519% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.09 | 14.73 | 537% |
| Returns for 10 years | 116.87 | -4.64 | -2,518% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement