Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs NMPAX
FSMDX vs NMPAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs NMPAX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$35.96
Change-$0.25 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.38B
Columbia Mid Cap Index Inst
Price$14.33
Change-$0.16 (-1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.51B
FSMDX vs NMPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. NMPAX commentary
Aug 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and NMPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 42.4B vs. NMPAX (2.51B). NMPAX (1.31) and FSMDX (1.29) have matching dividends . FSMDX was incepted earlier than NMPAX: FSMDX (14 years) vs NMPAX (25 years). NMPAX (0.33) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). NMPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMPAX: FSMDX (0) vs NMPAX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.54 vs. NMPAX (-4.71). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 70.86 vs. NMPAX (10.43).
| FSMDX | NMPAX | FSMDX / NMPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.20 | 13% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.33 | 8% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.485 | 0.091 | 8,192% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.4B | 2.51B | 1,688% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 1.31 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.54 | -4.71 | -245% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.17 | 4.99 | 765% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.86 | 10.43 | 679% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.35 | -0.38 | -32,904% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement