Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs NMPAX
FSMDX vs NMPAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs NMPAX
Columbia Mid Cap Index Inst
Price$14.11
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.45B
FSMDX vs NMPAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. NMPAX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and NMPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 40.4B vs. NMPAX (2.45B). NMPAX pays higher dividends than FSMDX: NMPAX (1.41) vs FSMDX (1.14). FSMDX was incepted earlier than NMPAX: FSMDX (14 years) vs NMPAX (25 years). NMPAX (0.34) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). NMPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMPAX: FSMDX (0) vs NMPAX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.27 vs. NMPAX (-5.35). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 63.08 vs. NMPAX (0.49).
| FSMDX | NMPAX | FSMDX / NMPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.20 | 13% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.34 | 7% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.866 | -2.621 | -71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.4B | 2.45B | 1,648% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 1.41 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.27 | -5.35 | -192% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.17 | -3.97 | -709% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.08 | 0.49 | 12,784% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.08 | -5.82 | -1,910% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers