Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs NMPAX
FSMDX vs NMPAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs NMPAX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$37.36
Change+$0.23 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.03B
Columbia Mid Cap Index Inst
Price$15.11
Change+$0.07 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.51B
FSMDX vs NMPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. NMPAX commentary
Nov 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a StrongBuy and NMPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 45B vs. NMPAX (2.51B). NMPAX (1.27) and FSMDX (1.26) have matching dividends . FSMDX was incepted earlier than NMPAX: FSMDX (14 years) vs NMPAX (26 years). NMPAX (0.33) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). NMPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMPAX: FSMDX (0) vs NMPAX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.48 vs. NMPAX (-8.86). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 49.77 vs. NMPAX (-3.10).
| FSMDX | NMPAX | FSMDX / NMPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.20 | 13% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.33 | 8% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.216 | 4.374 | 234% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45B | 2.51B | 1,796% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 1.27 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.48 | -8.86 | -17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.15 | 8.65 | 499% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.77 | -3.10 | -1,603% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.60 | 5.08 | 2,629% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers