Ad is loading...
FSMDX vs NMPAX
FSMDX vs NMPAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs NMPAX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$31.98
Change+$0.62 (+1.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.64B
Columbia Mid Cap Index Inst
Price$13.26
Change+$0.27 (+2.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.27B
FSMDX vs NMPAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. NMPAX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and NMPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 37.6B vs. NMPAX (2.27B). NMPAX pays higher dividends than FSMDX: NMPAX (1.45) vs FSMDX (1.20). FSMDX was incepted earlier than NMPAX: FSMDX (14 years) vs NMPAX (25 years). NMPAX (0.34) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). NMPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMPAX: FSMDX (0) vs NMPAX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.08 vs. NMPAX (-11.23). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 77.28 vs. NMPAX (14.20).
| FSMDX | NMPAX | FSMDX / NMPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.20 | 13% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.34 | 7% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.137 | -10.414 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.6B | 2.27B | 1,656% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 1.45 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.08 | -11.23 | -19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.77 | -13.63 | -94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 77.28 | 14.20 | 544% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.07 | -13.51 | -659% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers