Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs NMPAX
FSMDX vs NMPAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs NMPAX
FSMDX vs NMPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. NMPAX commentary
Aug 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and NMPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 52.1B vs. NMPAX (2.57B). NMPAX pays higher dividends than FSMDX: NMPAX (1.16) vs FSMDX (0.76). FSMDX was incepted earlier than NMPAX: FSMDX (15 years) vs NMPAX (26 years). NMPAX (0.34) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). NMPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMPAX: FSMDX (0) vs NMPAX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.83 vs. NMPAX (13.55). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 50.57 vs. NMPAX (-3.15).
| FSMDX | NMPAX | FSMDX / NMPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.20 | 13% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.34 | 7% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.361 | 14.487 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.1B | 2.57B | 2,027% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 1.16 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.83 | 13.55 | 168% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.36 | 22.97 | 285% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.57 | -3.15 | -1,604% |
| Returns for 10 years | 171.54 | 16.15 | 1,062% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement