Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs NTIAX
FSMDX vs NTIAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs NTIAX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$36.58
Change+$0.22 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.38B
Columbia Mid Cap Index A
Price$14.75
Change+$0.13 (+0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.57B
FSMDX vs NTIAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. NTIAX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and NTIAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 42.4B vs. NTIAX (2.57B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than NTIAX: FSMDX (1.31) vs NTIAX (1.07). FSMDX was incepted earlier than NTIAX: FSMDX (14 years) vs NTIAX (25 years). NTIAX (0.58) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). NTIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than NTIAX: FSMDX (0) vs NTIAX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.20 vs. NTIAX (-1.64). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 75.40 vs. NTIAX (11.53).
| FSMDX | NTIAX | FSMDX / NTIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.45 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.58 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.584 | 1.007 | 852% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.4B | 2.57B | 1,648% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 1.07 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.20 | -1.64 | -927% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.45 | 10.44 | 445% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.40 | 11.53 | 654% |
| Returns for 10 years | 128.19 | 0.72 | 17,816% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers