Ad is loading...
FSMDX vs NTIAX
FSMDX vs NTIAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs NTIAX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$34.40
Change+$0.22 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.69B
Columbia Mid Cap Index A
Price$14.38
Change+$0.04 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.49B
FSMDX vs NTIAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. NTIAX commentary
May 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and NTIAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 37.7B vs. NTIAX (2.49B). NTIAX (1.21) and FSMDX (1.21) have matching dividends . FSMDX was incepted earlier than NTIAX: FSMDX (14 years) vs NTIAX (25 years). NTIAX (0.59) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). NTIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than NTIAX: FSMDX (0) vs NTIAX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.77 vs. NTIAX (-5.92). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 91.30 vs. NTIAX (22.71).
| FSMDX | NTIAX | FSMDX / NTIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.45 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.59 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.214 | -1.915 | -63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.7B | 2.49B | 1,512% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 1.21 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.77 | -5.92 | -148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.87 | 0.45 | 7,123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 91.30 | 22.71 | 402% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.28 | -6.95 | -1,514% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...