Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs NTIAX
FSMDX vs NTIAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs NTIAX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$36.90
Change+$0.34 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.83B
Columbia Mid Cap Index A
Price$15.13
Change+$0.08 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.57B
FSMDX vs NTIAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. NTIAX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and NTIAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 44.8B vs. NTIAX (2.57B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than NTIAX: FSMDX (1.26) vs NTIAX (1.03). FSMDX was incepted earlier than NTIAX: FSMDX (14 years) vs NTIAX (25 years). NTIAX (0.58) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). NTIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than NTIAX: FSMDX (0) vs NTIAX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.47 vs. NTIAX (2.31). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 71.01 vs. NTIAX (11.34).
| FSMDX | NTIAX | FSMDX / NTIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.45 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.58 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.771 | 3.610 | 271% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.8B | 2.57B | 1,744% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 1.03 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.47 | 2.31 | 626% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.43 | 14.03 | 338% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.01 | 11.34 | 626% |
| Returns for 10 years | 140.48 | 7.51 | 1,871% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers