Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs NTIAX
FSMDX vs NTIAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs NTIAX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$36.16
Change-$0.09 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.39B
Columbia Mid Cap Index A
Price$14.55
Change-$0.08 (-0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.54B
FSMDX vs NTIAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. NTIAX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and NTIAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 43.4B vs. NTIAX (2.54B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than NTIAX: FSMDX (1.29) vs NTIAX (1.06). FSMDX was incepted earlier than NTIAX: FSMDX (14 years) vs NTIAX (25 years). NTIAX (0.58) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). NTIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than NTIAX: FSMDX (0) vs NTIAX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.79 vs. NTIAX (-1.92). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 66.55 vs. NTIAX (4.85).
| FSMDX | NTIAX | FSMDX / NTIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.45 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.58 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.604 | 0.186 | 4,094% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.4B | 2.54B | 1,711% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 1.06 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.79 | -1.92 | -665% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.08 | -0.41 | -7,572% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.55 | 4.85 | 1,372% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.85 | -1.98 | -6,204% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers