Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs NTIAX
FSMDX vs NTIAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs NTIAX
FSMDX vs NTIAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. NTIAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and NTIAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.2B vs. NTIAX (2.52B). NTIAX pays higher dividends than FSMDX: NTIAX (0.92) vs FSMDX (0.76). FSMDX was incepted earlier than NTIAX: FSMDX (15 years) vs NTIAX (26 years). NTIAX (0.59) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). NTIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than NTIAX: FSMDX (0) vs NTIAX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.67 vs. NTIAX (9.67). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 45.89 vs. NTIAX (-7.79).
| FSMDX | NTIAX | FSMDX / NTIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.45 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.59 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.947 | 10.251 | 146% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.2B | 2.52B | 2,109% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.92 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.67 | 9.67 | 203% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.50 | 13.94 | 377% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.89 | -7.79 | -589% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.79 | 12.11 | 1,369% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers