Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs NTIAX
FSMDX vs NTIAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs NTIAX
FSMDX vs NTIAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. NTIAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and NTIAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. NTIAX (2.46B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than NTIAX: FSMDX (0.99) vs NTIAX (0.91). FSMDX was incepted earlier than NTIAX: FSMDX (15 years) vs NTIAX (26 years). NTIAX (0.58) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). NTIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than NTIAX: FSMDX (0) vs NTIAX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.60 vs. NTIAX (20.39). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 43.56 vs. NTIAX (-4.28).
| FSMDX | NTIAX | FSMDX / NTIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.45 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.58 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.027 | 15.281 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 2.46B | 2,090% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.91 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.60 | 20.39 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.71 | 26.75 | 227% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.56 | -4.28 | -1,019% |
| Returns for 10 years | 179.66 | 24.18 | 743% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers