Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs PESPX
FSMDX vs PESPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs PESPX
FSMDX vs PESPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
A.I.Advisor
published Highlights
Market Cap
The average market capitalization across the group is 27.18B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 1.24B to 53.11B. FSMDX holds the highest valuation in this group at 53.11B. The lowest valued company is PESPX at 1.24B.
High and low price notable news
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the group was -3%. For the same group, the average monthly price growth was -1%, and the average quarterly price growth was 11%. FSMDX experienced the highest price growth at -2%, while PESPX experienced the biggest fall at -3%.
Volume
The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the group was 0%. For the same stocks of the group, the average monthly volume growth was 0% and the average quarterly volume growth was 0%
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Valuation Rating:
P/E Growth Rating:
Price Growth Rating:
SMR Rating:
Profit Risk Rating:
Seasonality Score: (-100 ... +100)
FSMDX vs. PESPX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and PESPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. PESPX (1.25B). PESPX pays higher dividends than FSMDX: PESPX (0.93) vs FSMDX (0.75). FSMDX was incepted earlier than PESPX: FSMDX (15 years) vs PESPX (35 years). PESPX (0.51) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). FSMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. PESPX (13.97). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than PESPX: FSMDX (0) vs PESPX (2500). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.45 vs. PESPX (4.46). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 39.42 vs. PESPX (-21.17).
| FSMDX | PESPX | FSMDX / PESPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.50 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.51 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.489 | 13.126 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 1.25B | 4,245% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.93 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.45 | 4.46 | 392% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.10 | 5.94 | 928% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.42 | -21.17 | -186% |
| Returns for 10 years | 162.29 | -13.03 | -1,245% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers