Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs PFSLX
FSMDX vs PFSLX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs PFSLX
FSMDX vs PFSLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. PFSLX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and PFSLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 40.4B vs. PFSLX (111M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than PFSLX: FSMDX (1.14) vs PFSLX (0.02). FSMDX was incepted earlier than PFSLX: FSMDX (14 years) vs PFSLX (20 years). PFSLX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). PFSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.11 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFSLX: FSMDX (0) vs PFSLX (2500). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.45 vs. PFSLX (-3.89). PFSLX return over 5 years is better than : 83.19 vs. FSMDX (75.56).
| FSMDX | PFSLX | FSMDX / PFSLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.16 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.16 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.724 | -9.088 | -30% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.4B | 111M | 36,396% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 0.02 | 5,546% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.45 | -3.89 | -294% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.91 | 38.62 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.56 | 83.19 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.33 | 110.64 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers