Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs PFSLX
FSMDX vs PFSLX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs PFSLX
FSMDX vs PFSLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. PFSLX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and PFSLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. PFSLX (297M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than PFSLX: FSMDX (0.75) vs PFSLX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than PFSLX: FSMDX (15 years) vs PFSLX (22 years). PFSLX (1.26) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). PFSLX (15.49) and FSMDX (15.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFSLX: FSMDX (0) vs PFSLX (2500). PFSLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 54.99 vs. FSMDX (13.26). PFSLX return over 5 years is better than : 85.73 vs. FSMDX (40.31).
| FSMDX | PFSLX | FSMDX / PFSLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.26 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.26 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.837 | 39.621 | 35% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 297M | 17,879% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.00 | 1,493,860% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.26 | 54.99 | 24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.18 | 107.30 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.31 | 85.73 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.00 | 312.97 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement