Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs PMAPX
FSMDX vs PMAPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs PMAPX
FSMDX vs PMAPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. PMAPX commentary
Jun 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and PMAPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. PMAPX (1.39B). PMAPX pays higher dividends than FSMDX: PMAPX (1.11) vs FSMDX (0.99). FSMDX was incepted earlier than PMAPX: FSMDX (15 years) vs PMAPX (10 years). PMAPX (0.16) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). PMAPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.20 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and PMAPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.28 vs. PMAPX (17.95). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 46.33 vs. PMAPX (6.86).
| FSMDX | PMAPX | FSMDX / PMAPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.16 | 16% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.16 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.324 | 15.794 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 1.39B | 3,710% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 1.11 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.28 | 17.95 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.18 | 24.05 | 238% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.33 | 6.86 | 675% |
| Returns for 10 years | 176.08 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement