Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs PMAPX
FSMDX vs PMAPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs PMAPX
FSMDX vs PMAPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. PMAPX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and PMAPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.2B vs. PMAPX (1.38B). PMAPX pays higher dividends than FSMDX: PMAPX (1.08) vs FSMDX (0.76). FSMDX was incepted earlier than PMAPX: FSMDX (15 years) vs PMAPX (10 years). PMAPX (0.16) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). PMAPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.20 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and PMAPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.67 vs. PMAPX (12.17). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 45.89 vs. PMAPX (6.40).
| FSMDX | PMAPX | FSMDX / PMAPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.16 | 16% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.16 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.947 | 15.100 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.2B | 1.38B | 3,847% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 1.08 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.67 | 12.17 | 162% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.50 | 18.89 | 278% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.89 | 6.40 | 718% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.79 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement