Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs PMFPX
FSMDX vs PMFPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs PMFPX
FSMDX vs PMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. PMFPX commentary
Sep 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and PMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. PMFPX (1.38B). PMFPX pays higher dividends than FSMDX: PMFPX (0.82) vs FSMDX (0.75). FSMDX was incepted earlier than PMFPX: FSMDX (15 years) vs PMFPX (26 years). PMFPX (0.42) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). PMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.20 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and PMFPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.80 vs. PMFPX (3.95). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 41.16 vs. PMFPX (2.45).
| FSMDX | PMFPX | FSMDX / PMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.42 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.42 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.485 | 11.170 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 1.38B | 3,853% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.82 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.80 | 3.95 | 350% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.38 | 20.15 | 305% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.16 | 2.45 | 1,680% |
| Returns for 10 years | 159.91 | 41.60 | 384% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers