Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs PMFPX
FSMDX vs PMFPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs PMFPX
FSMDX vs PMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. PMFPX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and PMFPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. PMFPX (1.36B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than PMFPX: FSMDX (0.99) vs PMFPX (0.83). FSMDX was incepted earlier than PMFPX: FSMDX (15 years) vs PMFPX (26 years). PMFPX (0.42) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). PMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.20 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and PMFPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.46 vs. PMFPX (17.16). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 42.72 vs. PMFPX (2.99).
| FSMDX | PMFPX | FSMDX / PMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.42 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.42 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.996 | 13.009 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 1.36B | 3,798% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.83 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.46 | 17.16 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.36 | 25.24 | 235% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.72 | 2.99 | 1,428% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.70 | 46.84 | 356% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement