Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs QCGDX
FSMDX vs QCGDX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs QCGDX
FSMDX vs QCGDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. QCGDX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and QCGDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.2B vs. QCGDX (108M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than QCGDX: FSMDX (0.76) vs QCGDX (0.60). FSMDX was incepted earlier than QCGDX: FSMDX (15 years) vs QCGDX (7 years). QCGDX (1.61) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). QCGDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 711.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCGDX: FSMDX (0) vs QCGDX (10000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.67 vs. QCGDX (18.13). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 45.89 vs. QCGDX (37.20).
| FSMDX | QCGDX | FSMDX / QCGDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.61 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.61 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.947 | 13.648 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 10000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.2B | 108M | 49,259% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.60 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.67 | 18.13 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.50 | 30.89 | 170% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.89 | 37.20 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.79 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers