Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs QCGDX
FSMDX vs QCGDX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs QCGDX
FSMDX vs QCGDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. QCGDX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and QCGDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. QCGDX (101M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than QCGDX: FSMDX (0.75) vs QCGDX (0.63). FSMDX was incepted earlier than QCGDX: FSMDX (15 years) vs QCGDX (7 years). QCGDX (1.61) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). QCGDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 711.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCGDX: FSMDX (0) vs QCGDX (10000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.26 vs. QCGDX (11.50). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. QCGDX (25.02).
| FSMDX | QCGDX | FSMDX / QCGDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.61 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.61 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.837 | 9.121 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 10000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 101M | 52,574% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.63 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.26 | 11.50 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.18 | 28.38 | 198% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.31 | 25.02 | 161% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.00 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement