Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs RCKSX
FSMDX vs RCKSX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs RCKSX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$35.96
Change-$0.25 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.38B
FSMDX vs RCKSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. RCKSX commentary
Aug 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and RCKSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 42.4B vs. RCKSX (12.5M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than RCKSX: FSMDX (1.31) vs RCKSX (0.22). FSMDX was incepted earlier than RCKSX: FSMDX (14 years) vs RCKSX (21 years). RCKSX (1.53) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). FSMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. RCKSX (11.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCKSX: FSMDX (0) vs RCKSX (2000). RCKSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.24 vs. FSMDX (11.54). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 70.86 vs. RCKSX (23.35).
| FSMDX | RCKSX | FSMDX / RCKSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.25 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.53 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.485 | 9.922 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.4B | 12.5M | 339,200% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.22 | 588% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.54 | 13.24 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.17 | 35.05 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.86 | 23.35 | 304% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.35 | 62.50 | 199% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement