Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs RCKSX
FSMDX vs RCKSX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs RCKSX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$37.13
Change-$0.31 (-0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.83B
FSMDX vs RCKSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. RCKSX commentary
Sep 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and RCKSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 44.8B vs. RCKSX (12.4M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than RCKSX: FSMDX (1.26) vs RCKSX (0.22). FSMDX was incepted earlier than RCKSX: FSMDX (14 years) vs RCKSX (21 years). RCKSX (1.53) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). FSMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. RCKSX (11.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCKSX: FSMDX (0) vs RCKSX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.20 vs. RCKSX (12.77). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 75.20 vs. RCKSX (27.10).
| FSMDX | RCKSX | FSMDX / RCKSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.25 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.53 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.216 | 10.338 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.8B | 12.4M | 361,290% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 0.22 | 564% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.20 | 12.77 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.03 | 40.52 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.20 | 27.10 | 277% |
| Returns for 10 years | 141.17 | 74.10 | 191% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement