Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs RCKSX
FSMDX vs RCKSX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs RCKSX
FSMDX vs RCKSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. RCKSX commentary
Jun 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and RCKSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 40.4B vs. RCKSX (12.2M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than RCKSX: FSMDX (1.14) vs RCKSX (0.23). FSMDX was incepted earlier than RCKSX: FSMDX (14 years) vs RCKSX (20 years). RCKSX (1.53) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). RCKSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 11.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCKSX: FSMDX (0) vs RCKSX (2000). RCKSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.78 vs. FSMDX (10.16). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 70.43 vs. RCKSX (27.26).
| FSMDX | RCKSX | FSMDX / RCKSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.25 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.53 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.569 | 7.221 | 22% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.4B | 12.2M | 331,148% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 0.23 | 500% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.16 | 15.78 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.01 | 45.69 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.43 | 27.26 | 258% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.12 | 54.38 | 197% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers