Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs RCKSX
FSMDX vs RCKSX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs RCKSX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$37.46
Change+$0.11 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.37B
FSMDX vs RCKSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. RCKSX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and RCKSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 45.4B vs. RCKSX (12.8M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than RCKSX: FSMDX (1.25) vs RCKSX (0.22). FSMDX was incepted earlier than RCKSX: FSMDX (14 years) vs RCKSX (21 years). RCKSX (1.53) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). FSMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. RCKSX (11.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCKSX: FSMDX (0) vs RCKSX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.82 vs. RCKSX (11.08). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 71.97 vs. RCKSX (26.54).
| FSMDX | RCKSX | FSMDX / RCKSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.25 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.53 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.196 | 12.831 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.4B | 12.8M | 354,688% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 0.22 | 574% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.82 | 11.08 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.02 | 48.15 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.97 | 26.54 | 271% |
| Returns for 10 years | 145.92 | 82.37 | 177% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers