Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs RCKSX
FSMDX vs RCKSX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs RCKSX
FSMDX vs RCKSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. RCKSX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and RCKSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. RCKSX (16M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than RCKSX: FSMDX (0.75) vs RCKSX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than RCKSX: FSMDX (15 years) vs RCKSX (22 years). RCKSX (1.49) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). FSMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. RCKSX (12.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCKSX: FSMDX (0) vs RCKSX (2000). RCKSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.65 vs. FSMDX (13.26). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. RCKSX (36.83).
| FSMDX | RCKSX | FSMDX / RCKSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.25 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.49 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.837 | 21.571 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 16M | 331,875% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.26 | 15.65 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.18 | 63.18 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.31 | 36.83 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.00 | 103.36 | 162% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers