Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs RCKSX
FSMDX vs RCKSX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs RCKSX
FSMDX vs RCKSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. RCKSX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and RCKSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.2B vs. RCKSX (13.5M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than RCKSX: FSMDX (0.76) vs RCKSX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than RCKSX: FSMDX (15 years) vs RCKSX (22 years). RCKSX (1.49) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). FSMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. RCKSX (12.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCKSX: FSMDX (0) vs RCKSX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.67 vs. RCKSX (15.96). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 45.89 vs. RCKSX (37.14).
| FSMDX | RCKSX | FSMDX / RCKSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.25 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.49 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.947 | 19.473 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.2B | 13.5M | 394,074% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.67 | 15.96 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.50 | 59.44 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.89 | 37.14 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.79 | 103.08 | 161% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers