Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs RCKSX
FSMDX vs RCKSX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs RCKSX
FSMDX vs RCKSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. RCKSX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and RCKSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. RCKSX (13M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than RCKSX: FSMDX (0.99) vs RCKSX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than RCKSX: FSMDX (15 years) vs RCKSX (21 years). RCKSX (1.49) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). FSMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. RCKSX (12.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCKSX: FSMDX (0) vs RCKSX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.14 vs. RCKSX (13.22). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 43.00 vs. RCKSX (26.84).
| FSMDX | RCKSX | FSMDX / RCKSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.25 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.49 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.781 | 14.104 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 13M | 396,154% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.14 | 13.22 | 167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.47 | 60.89 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.00 | 26.84 | 160% |
| Returns for 10 years | 168.57 | 96.98 | 174% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement