Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs RCKSX
FSMDX vs RCKSX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs RCKSX
FSMDX vs RCKSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. RCKSX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and RCKSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. RCKSX (13.1M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than RCKSX: FSMDX (0.99) vs RCKSX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than RCKSX: FSMDX (15 years) vs RCKSX (21 years). RCKSX (1.49) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). FSMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. RCKSX (12.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCKSX: FSMDX (0) vs RCKSX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.60 vs. RCKSX (13.21). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 43.56 vs. RCKSX (30.46).
| FSMDX | RCKSX | FSMDX / RCKSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.25 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.49 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.027 | 15.471 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 13.1M | 393,130% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.60 | 13.21 | 171% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.71 | 59.87 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.56 | 30.46 | 143% |
| Returns for 10 years | 179.66 | 107.52 | 167% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers