Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs RSINX
FSMDX vs RSINX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs RSINX
FSMDX vs RSINX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. RSINX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and RSINX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. RSINX (70.7M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than RSINX: FSMDX (0.99) vs RSINX (0.40). FSMDX was incepted earlier than RSINX: FSMDX (15 years) vs RSINX (21 years). RSINX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). RSINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 93.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSINX: FSMDX (0) vs RSINX (2500). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.60 vs. RSINX (9.63). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 43.56 vs. RSINX (16.96).
| FSMDX | RSINX | FSMDX / RSINX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.33 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.57 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.027 | 6.428 | 218% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 70.7M | 72,843% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.40 | 244% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.60 | 9.63 | 235% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.71 | 31.92 | 190% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.56 | 16.96 | 257% |
| Returns for 10 years | 179.66 | 44.02 | 408% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers