Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs RSINX
FSMDX vs RSINX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs RSINX
FSMDX vs RSINX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. RSINX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and RSINX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.2B vs. RSINX (72M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than RSINX: FSMDX (0.76) vs RSINX (0.40). FSMDX was incepted earlier than RSINX: FSMDX (15 years) vs RSINX (21 years). RSINX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). RSINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 93.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSINX: FSMDX (0) vs RSINX (2500). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.67 vs. RSINX (10.37). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 45.89 vs. RSINX (22.27).
| FSMDX | RSINX | FSMDX / RSINX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.33 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.57 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.947 | 9.278 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.2B | 72M | 73,889% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.40 | 188% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.67 | 10.37 | 190% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.50 | 31.64 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.89 | 22.27 | 206% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.79 | 38.96 | 425% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement