Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs RSINX
FSMDX vs RSINX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs RSINX
FSMDX vs RSINX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. RSINX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and RSINX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. RSINX (74.2M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than RSINX: FSMDX (0.75) vs RSINX (0.38). FSMDX was incepted earlier than RSINX: FSMDX (15 years) vs RSINX (21 years). RSINX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). RSINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 93.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSINX: FSMDX (0) vs RSINX (2500). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.26 vs. RSINX (12.41). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. RSINX (25.71).
| FSMDX | RSINX | FSMDX / RSINX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.33 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.57 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.837 | 14.008 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 74.2M | 71,563% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.38 | 198% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.26 | 12.41 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.18 | 35.86 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.31 | 25.71 | 157% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.00 | 46.66 | 358% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers