Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs RSINX
FSMDX vs RSINX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs RSINX
FSMDX vs RSINX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. RSINX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and RSINX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. RSINX (71.2M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than RSINX: FSMDX (0.99) vs RSINX (0.40). FSMDX was incepted earlier than RSINX: FSMDX (15 years) vs RSINX (21 years). RSINX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). RSINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 93.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSINX: FSMDX (0) vs RSINX (2500). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.46 vs. RSINX (11.27). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 42.72 vs. RSINX (14.22).
| FSMDX | RSINX | FSMDX / RSINX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.33 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.57 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.996 | 6.671 | 180% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 71.2M | 72,331% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.40 | 244% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.46 | 11.27 | 199% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.36 | 31.06 | 191% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.72 | 14.22 | 301% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.70 | 39.15 | 426% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement