Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs SBMAX
FSMDX vs SBMAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs SBMAX
FSMDX vs SBMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. SBMAX commentary
Jun 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and SBMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. SBMAX (1.56B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than SBMAX: FSMDX (0.99) vs SBMAX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than SBMAX: FSMDX (15 years) vs SBMAX (28 years). SBMAX (1.15) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). SBMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBMAX: FSMDX (0) vs SBMAX (1000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.05 vs. SBMAX (-1.33). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 43.68 vs. SBMAX (-20.92).
| FSMDX | SBMAX | FSMDX / SBMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.15 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.15 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.920 | 5.208 | 286% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 1.56B | 3,310% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.05 | -1.33 | -1,659% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.58 | 8.25 | 710% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.68 | -20.92 | -209% |
| Returns for 10 years | 183.89 | 24.55 | 749% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement