Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs SBMLX
FSMDX vs SBMLX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs SBMLX
FSMDX vs SBMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. SBMLX commentary
Jun 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and SBMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 40.4B vs. SBMLX (1.67B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than SBMLX: FSMDX (1.14) vs SBMLX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than SBMLX: FSMDX (14 years) vs SBMLX (27 years). SBMLX (1.88) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). SBMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBMLX: FSMDX (0) vs SBMLX (1000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.00 vs. SBMLX (-1.68). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 80.53 vs. SBMLX (-1.33).
| FSMDX | SBMLX | FSMDX / SBMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.88 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.88 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.027 | 1.739 | 232% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.4B | 1.67B | 2,425% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.00 | -1.68 | -774% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.72 | -2.63 | -1,588% |
| Returns for 5 years | 80.53 | -1.33 | -6,048% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.77 | -18.33 | -621% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement