Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs SBMLX
FSMDX vs SBMLX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs SBMLX
FSMDX vs SBMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. SBMLX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and SBMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. SBMLX (1.51B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than SBMLX: FSMDX (0.99) vs SBMLX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than SBMLX: FSMDX (15 years) vs SBMLX (28 years). SBMLX (1.89) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). SBMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBMLX: FSMDX (0) vs SBMLX (1000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.46 vs. SBMLX (-7.30). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 42.72 vs. SBMLX (-37.49).
| FSMDX | SBMLX | FSMDX / SBMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.89 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.89 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.996 | 0.809 | 1,483% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 1.51B | 3,402% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.46 | -7.30 | -308% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.36 | -5.09 | -1,165% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.72 | -37.49 | -114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.70 | -17.09 | -975% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers