Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs SCNSX
FSMDX vs SCNSX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs SCNSX
FSMDX vs SCNSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. SCNSX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and SCNSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. SCNSX (627M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than SCNSX: FSMDX (0.75) vs SCNSX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than SCNSX: FSMDX (15 years) vs SCNSX (16 years). SCNSX (0.96) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). SCNSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCNSX: FSMDX (0) vs SCNSX (1000000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.26 vs. SCNSX (8.50). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. SCNSX (-20.56).
| FSMDX | SCNSX | FSMDX / SCNSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.86 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.96 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.837 | 12.075 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 627M | 8,469% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.26 | 8.50 | 156% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.18 | 17.29 | 325% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.31 | -20.56 | -196% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.00 | -0.42 | -39,837% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement