Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs SCSAX
FSMDX vs SCSAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs SCSAX
FSMDX vs SCSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. SCSAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and SCSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. SCSAX (627M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than SCSAX: FSMDX (0.75) vs SCSAX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than SCSAX: FSMDX (15 years) vs SCSAX (26 years). SCSAX (1.27) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). SCSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCSAX: FSMDX (0) vs SCSAX (1000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.26 vs. SCSAX (7.52). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. SCSAX (-25.41).
| FSMDX | SCSAX | FSMDX / SCSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.22 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.27 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.837 | 11.821 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 627M | 8,469% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.26 | 7.52 | 176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.18 | 14.28 | 393% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.31 | -25.41 | -159% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.00 | -10.50 | -1,590% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers