Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs SCSAX
FSMDX vs SCSAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs SCSAX
FSMDX vs SCSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. SCSAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and SCSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.2B vs. SCSAX (662M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than SCSAX: FSMDX (0.76) vs SCSAX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than SCSAX: FSMDX (15 years) vs SCSAX (26 years). SCSAX (1.27) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). SCSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCSAX: FSMDX (0) vs SCSAX (1000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.67 vs. SCSAX (11.89). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 45.89 vs. SCSAX (-20.67).
| FSMDX | SCSAX | FSMDX / SCSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.22 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.27 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.947 | 15.701 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.2B | 662M | 8,036% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.67 | 11.89 | 165% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.50 | 14.47 | 363% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.89 | -20.67 | -222% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.79 | -7.04 | -2,355% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers