Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs SCSRX
FSMDX vs SCSRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs SCSRX
FSMDX vs SCSRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. SCSRX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and SCSRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.2B vs. SCSRX (662M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than SCSRX: FSMDX (0.76) vs SCSRX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than SCSRX: FSMDX (15 years) vs SCSRX (13 years). SCSRX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). SCSRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and SCSRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.67 vs. SCSRX (12.88). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 45.89 vs. SCSRX (-15.18).
| FSMDX | SCSRX | FSMDX / SCSRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.81 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.86 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.947 | 15.923 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.2B | 662M | 8,036% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.67 | 12.88 | 153% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.50 | 17.69 | 297% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.89 | -15.18 | -302% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.79 | 4.11 | 4,029% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement