Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs SCSRX
FSMDX vs SCSRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs SCSRX
FSMDX vs SCSRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. SCSRX commentary
Jun 09, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and SCSRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. SCSRX (643M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than SCSRX: FSMDX (0.99) vs SCSRX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than SCSRX: FSMDX (15 years) vs SCSRX (13 years). SCSRX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). SCSRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and SCSRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.26 vs. SCSRX (11.87). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.36 vs. SCSRX (-19.16).
| FSMDX | SCSRX | FSMDX / SCSRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.84 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.86 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.696 | 10.944 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 643M | 8,009% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.26 | 11.87 | 162% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.89 | 18.83 | 297% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.36 | -19.16 | -211% |
| Returns for 10 years | 164.96 | 1.05 | 15,720% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement