Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs SCSRX
FSMDX vs SCSRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs SCSRX
FSMDX vs SCSRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. SCSRX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and SCSRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. SCSRX (627M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than SCSRX: FSMDX (0.75) vs SCSRX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than SCSRX: FSMDX (15 years) vs SCSRX (13 years). SCSRX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). SCSRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and SCSRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.26 vs. SCSRX (8.53). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. SCSRX (-20.22).
| FSMDX | SCSRX | FSMDX / SCSRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.81 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.86 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.837 | 12.137 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 627M | 8,469% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.26 | 8.53 | 155% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.18 | 17.56 | 320% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.31 | -20.22 | -199% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.00 | 0.25 | 67,097% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers