Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs SEMCX
FSMDX vs SEMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs SEMCX
FSMDX vs SEMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. SEMCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and SEMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 40.4B vs. SEMCX (68.5M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than SEMCX: FSMDX (1.14) vs SEMCX (0.75). FSMDX was incepted earlier than SEMCX: FSMDX (14 years) vs SEMCX (32 years). SEMCX (0.99) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). SEMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than SEMCX: FSMDX (0) vs SEMCX (100000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.44 vs. SEMCX (2.75). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 62.65 vs. SEMCX (31.38).
| FSMDX | SEMCX | FSMDX / SEMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.98 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.99 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.599 | 0.653 | 245% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.4B | 68.5M | 58,978% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 0.75 | 152% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.44 | 2.75 | 380% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.25 | 15.73 | 167% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.65 | 31.38 | 200% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.76 | 19.67 | 563% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement