Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs SEMCX
FSMDX vs SEMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs SEMCX
FSMDX vs SEMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. SEMCX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and SEMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 40.4B vs. SEMCX (69.6M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than SEMCX: FSMDX (1.14) vs SEMCX (0.75). FSMDX was incepted earlier than SEMCX: FSMDX (14 years) vs SEMCX (32 years). SEMCX (0.99) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). SEMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than SEMCX: FSMDX (0) vs SEMCX (100000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.59 vs. SEMCX (4.69). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 81.13 vs. SEMCX (46.16).
| FSMDX | SEMCX | FSMDX / SEMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.98 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.99 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.368 | 2.725 | 160% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.4B | 69.6M | 58,046% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 0.75 | 152% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.59 | 4.69 | 290% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.66 | 30.81 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.13 | 46.16 | 176% |
| Returns for 10 years | 118.59 | 22.72 | 522% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers