Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs SEMCX
FSMDX vs SEMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs SEMCX
FSMDX vs SEMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. SEMCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and SEMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 52.1B vs. SEMCX (58M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than SEMCX: FSMDX (0.76) vs SEMCX (0.48). FSMDX was incepted earlier than SEMCX: FSMDX (15 years) vs SEMCX (33 years). SEMCX (0.99) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). SEMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than SEMCX: FSMDX (0) vs SEMCX (100000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.74 vs. SEMCX (-0.85). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 42.85 vs. SEMCX (-4.17).
| FSMDX | SEMCX | FSMDX / SEMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.98 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.99 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.622 | 14.314 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.1B | 58M | 89,828% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.48 | 157% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.74 | -0.85 | -2,216% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.09 | 14.66 | 342% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.85 | -4.17 | -1,028% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.64 | 39.14 | 423% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers