Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs SEMCX
FSMDX vs SEMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs SEMCX
FSMDX vs SEMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. SEMCX commentary
Jun 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and SEMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. SEMCX (57.3M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than SEMCX: FSMDX (0.99) vs SEMCX (0.48). FSMDX was incepted earlier than SEMCX: FSMDX (15 years) vs SEMCX (33 years). SEMCX (0.99) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). SEMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than SEMCX: FSMDX (0) vs SEMCX (100000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.90 vs. SEMCX (2.67). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 47.64 vs. SEMCX (-0.72).
| FSMDX | SEMCX | FSMDX / SEMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.98 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.99 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.810 | 13.890 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 57.3M | 89,878% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.48 | 206% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.90 | 2.67 | 895% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.48 | 19.93 | 283% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.64 | -0.72 | -6,664% |
| Returns for 10 years | 174.83 | 44.22 | 395% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers