Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs SEMCX
FSMDX vs SEMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs SEMCX
FSMDX vs SEMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. SEMCX commentary
Aug 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and SEMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 52.1B vs. SEMCX (59.5M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than SEMCX: FSMDX (0.76) vs SEMCX (0.48). FSMDX was incepted earlier than SEMCX: FSMDX (15 years) vs SEMCX (34 years). SEMCX (0.99) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). SEMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than SEMCX: FSMDX (0) vs SEMCX (100000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.53 vs. SEMCX (0.48). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 47.15 vs. SEMCX (-1.57).
| FSMDX | SEMCX | FSMDX / SEMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.98 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.99 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.736 | 17.628 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.1B | 59.5M | 87,563% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.48 | 157% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.53 | 0.48 | 4,479% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.59 | 24.65 | 258% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.15 | -1.57 | -3,006% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.80 | 40.10 | 416% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers