Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs SMCPX
FSMDX vs SMCPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs SMCPX
FSMDX vs SMCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. SMCPX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and SMCPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. SMCPX (1.54B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than SMCPX: FSMDX (0.99) vs SMCPX (0.20). FSMDX was incepted earlier than SMCPX: FSMDX (15 years) vs SMCPX (26 years). SMCPX (0.85) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). SMCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and SMCPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.60 vs. SMCPX (0.33). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 43.56 vs. SMCPX (-18.00).
| FSMDX | SMCPX | FSMDX / SMCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.85 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.85 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.027 | 3.762 | 373% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 1.54B | 3,349% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.20 | 497% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.60 | 0.33 | 6,754% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.71 | 11.00 | 552% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.56 | -18.00 | -242% |
| Returns for 10 years | 179.66 | 29.63 | 606% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement