Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs SMDIX
FSMDX vs SMDIX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs SMDIX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$35.65
Change-$0.10 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.39B
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps I
Price$19.17
Change-$0.22 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets963.05M
FSMDX vs SMDIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. SMDIX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and SMDIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 43.4B vs. SMDIX (963M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than SMDIX: FSMDX (1.29) vs SMDIX (0.33). FSMDX was incepted earlier than SMDIX: FSMDX (14 years) vs SMDIX (19 years). SMDIX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). SMDIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMDIX: FSMDX (0) vs SMDIX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.07 vs. SMDIX (-0.22). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 65.33 vs. SMDIX (25.72).
| FSMDX | SMDIX | FSMDX / SMDIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.91 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.91 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.120 | -1.338 | -457% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.4B | 963M | 4,507% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 0.33 | 393% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.07 | -0.22 | -6,336% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.77 | 12.12 | 295% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.33 | 25.72 | 254% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.75 | 47.78 | 255% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement