Ad is loading...
FSMDX vs SMDIX
FSMDX vs SMDIX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs SMDIX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$33.25
Change+$0.44 (+1.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.69B
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps I
Price$18.55
Change+$0.17 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets946.75M
FSMDX vs SMDIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. SMDIX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and SMDIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 37.7B vs. SMDIX (947M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than SMDIX: FSMDX (1.21) vs SMDIX (0.35). FSMDX was incepted earlier than SMDIX: FSMDX (14 years) vs SMDIX (19 years). SMDIX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). SMDIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMDIX: FSMDX (0) vs SMDIX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.24 vs. SMDIX (-4.43). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 75.46 vs. SMDIX (36.72).
| FSMDX | SMDIX | FSMDX / SMDIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.91 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.91 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.843 | -5.404 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.7B | 947M | 3,981% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 0.35 | 343% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.24 | -4.43 | -118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.17 | 12.91 | 226% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.46 | 36.72 | 205% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.68 | 44.97 | 219% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers