Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs SMDIX
FSMDX vs SMDIX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs SMDIX
FSMDX vs SMDIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. SMDIX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and SMDIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. SMDIX (1.08B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than SMDIX: FSMDX (0.75) vs SMDIX (0.31). FSMDX was incepted earlier than SMDIX: FSMDX (15 years) vs SMDIX (20 years). SMDIX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). SMDIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMDIX: FSMDX (0) vs SMDIX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.23 vs. SMDIX (11.62). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 41.51 vs. SMDIX (6.52).
| FSMDX | SMDIX | FSMDX / SMDIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.92 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.92 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.812 | 16.036 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 1.08B | 4,930% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.31 | 240% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.23 | 11.62 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.52 | 28.67 | 201% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.51 | 6.52 | 637% |
| Returns for 10 years | 169.29 | 83.50 | 203% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers