Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs SMDRX
FSMDX vs SMDRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs SMDRX
FSMDX vs SMDRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. SMDRX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and SMDRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. SMDRX (1.08B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than SMDRX: FSMDX (0.75) vs SMDRX (0.41). FSMDX was incepted earlier than SMDRX: FSMDX (15 years) vs SMDRX (12 years). SMDRX (0.81) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). SMDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMDRX: FSMDX (0) vs SMDRX (5000000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.26 vs. SMDRX (10.96). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. SMDRX (6.37).
| FSMDX | SMDRX | FSMDX / SMDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.81 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.81 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.837 | 15.260 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 1.08B | 4,930% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.41 | 183% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.26 | 10.96 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.18 | 28.23 | 199% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.31 | 6.37 | 633% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.00 | 83.64 | 200% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers