Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs SMDVX
FSMDX vs SMDVX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs SMDVX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$36.16
Change-$0.09 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.39B
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps A
Price$18.26
Change-$0.04 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets973.29M
FSMDX vs SMDVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. SMDVX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and SMDVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 43.4B vs. SMDVX (973M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than SMDVX: FSMDX (1.29) vs SMDVX (0.16). FSMDX was incepted earlier than SMDVX: FSMDX (14 years) vs SMDVX (19 years). SMDVX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). SMDVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMDVX: FSMDX (0) vs SMDVX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.79 vs. SMDVX (-1.98). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 66.55 vs. SMDVX (23.50).
| FSMDX | SMDVX | FSMDX / SMDVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.16 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.16 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.604 | -0.327 | -2,327% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.4B | 973M | 4,460% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 0.16 | 828% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.79 | -1.98 | -647% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.08 | 6.76 | 460% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.55 | 23.50 | 283% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.85 | 41.99 | 293% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement