Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs SMDVX
FSMDX vs SMDVX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs SMDVX
FSMDX vs SMDVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. SMDVX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and SMDVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. SMDVX (1.07B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than SMDVX: FSMDX (0.75) vs SMDVX (0.18). FSMDX was incepted earlier than SMDVX: FSMDX (15 years) vs SMDVX (20 years). SMDVX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). SMDVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMDVX: FSMDX (0) vs SMDVX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.26 vs. SMDVX (9.91). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. SMDVX (2.46).
| FSMDX | SMDVX | FSMDX / SMDVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.16 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.16 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.837 | 14.941 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 1.07B | 4,967% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.18 | 418% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.26 | 9.91 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.18 | 25.46 | 221% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.31 | 2.46 | 1,635% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.00 | 74.79 | 223% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers