Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs SMDVX
FSMDX vs SMDVX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs SMDVX
FSMDX vs SMDVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. SMDVX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and SMDVX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. SMDVX (1.07B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than SMDVX: FSMDX (0.99) vs SMDVX (0.19). FSMDX was incepted earlier than SMDVX: FSMDX (15 years) vs SMDVX (20 years). SMDVX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). SMDVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMDVX: FSMDX (0) vs SMDVX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.60 vs. SMDVX (16.28). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 43.56 vs. SMDVX (6.42).
| FSMDX | SMDVX | FSMDX / SMDVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.16 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.16 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.027 | 14.717 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 1.07B | 4,818% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.19 | 530% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.60 | 16.28 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.71 | 27.22 | 223% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.56 | 6.42 | 678% |
| Returns for 10 years | 179.66 | 82.75 | 217% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers