Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs SMIPX
FSMDX vs SMIPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs SMIPX
FSMDX vs SMIPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. SMIPX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and SMIPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. SMIPX (10.1M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than SMIPX: FSMDX (0.75) vs SMIPX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than SMIPX: FSMDX (15 years) vs SMIPX (24 years). SMIPX (2.22) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). SMIPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 152.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMIPX: FSMDX (0) vs SMIPX (250). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.26 vs. SMIPX (-14.03). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. SMIPX (-10.58).
| FSMDX | SMIPX | FSMDX / SMIPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.22 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.22 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.837 | 9.432 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 10.1M | 525,743% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.26 | -14.03 | -95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.18 | 9.80 | 573% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.31 | -10.58 | -381% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.00 | 5.17 | 3,233% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers