Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs STRGX
FSMDX vs STRGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs STRGX
FSMDX vs STRGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. STRGX commentary
Sep 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and STRGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. STRGX (50.4M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than STRGX: FSMDX (0.75) vs STRGX (0.37). FSMDX was incepted earlier than STRGX: FSMDX (15 years) vs STRGX (54 years). STRGX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). STRGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.39 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than STRGX: FSMDX (0) vs STRGX (1000000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.91 vs. STRGX (0.20). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 39.83 vs. STRGX (-19.44).
| FSMDX | STRGX | FSMDX / STRGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.92 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.92 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 54 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.052 | 12.159 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 50.4M | 105,357% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.37 | 202% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.91 | 0.20 | 6,976% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.17 | -0.47 | -11,856% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.83 | -19.44 | -205% |
| Returns for 10 years | 162.90 | 20.31 | 802% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers