Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs STRGX
FSMDX vs STRGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs STRGX
FSMDX vs STRGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. STRGX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and STRGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. STRGX (54.2M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than STRGX: FSMDX (0.99) vs STRGX (0.37). FSMDX was incepted earlier than STRGX: FSMDX (15 years) vs STRGX (54 years). STRGX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). STRGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.39 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than STRGX: FSMDX (0) vs STRGX (1000000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.46 vs. STRGX (14.00). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 42.72 vs. STRGX (-19.97).
| FSMDX | STRGX | FSMDX / STRGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.92 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.92 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 54 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.996 | 15.574 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 54.2M | 95,018% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.37 | 268% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.46 | 14.00 | 160% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.36 | 9.07 | 654% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.72 | -19.97 | -214% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.70 | 26.14 | 638% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement