Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs STRGX
FSMDX vs STRGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs STRGX
FSMDX vs STRGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. STRGX commentary
Aug 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and STRGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 52.1B vs. STRGX (55.4M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than STRGX: FSMDX (0.76) vs STRGX (0.36). FSMDX was incepted earlier than STRGX: FSMDX (15 years) vs STRGX (54 years). STRGX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). STRGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.39 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than STRGX: FSMDX (0) vs STRGX (1000000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.37 vs. STRGX (10.52). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 45.81 vs. STRGX (-14.63).
| FSMDX | STRGX | FSMDX / STRGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.92 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.92 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 54 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.522 | 22.042 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.1B | 55.4M | 94,043% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.36 | 210% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.37 | 10.52 | 213% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.46 | 6.46 | 921% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.81 | -14.63 | -313% |
| Returns for 10 years | 170.68 | 29.17 | 585% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers