Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs STRGX
FSMDX vs STRGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs STRGX
FSMDX vs STRGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. STRGX commentary
Jul 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and STRGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.2B vs. STRGX (54.7M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than STRGX: FSMDX (0.76) vs STRGX (0.35). FSMDX was incepted earlier than STRGX: FSMDX (15 years) vs STRGX (54 years). STRGX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). STRGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.39 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than STRGX: FSMDX (0) vs STRGX (1000000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.48 vs. STRGX (9.70). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 42.85 vs. STRGX (-14.65).
| FSMDX | STRGX | FSMDX / STRGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.92 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.92 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 54 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.189 | 20.271 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.2B | 54.7M | 97,258% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.35 | 218% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.48 | 9.70 | 170% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.88 | 3.33 | 1,498% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.85 | -14.65 | -293% |
| Returns for 10 years | 162.40 | 28.64 | 567% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement