Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs STRLX
FSMDX vs STRLX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs STRLX
FSMDX vs STRLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. STRLX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and STRLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. STRLX (56.5M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than STRLX: FSMDX (0.99) vs STRLX (0.32). FSMDX was incepted earlier than STRLX: FSMDX (15 years) vs STRLX (11 years). STRLX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). STRLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.39 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than STRLX: FSMDX (0) vs STRLX (1000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.95 vs. STRLX (15.18). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 43.87 vs. STRLX (-15.55).
| FSMDX | STRLX | FSMDX / STRLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.17 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.17 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.431 | 19.934 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 56.5M | 91,150% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.32 | 308% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.95 | 15.18 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.87 | 10.63 | 563% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.87 | -15.55 | -282% |
| Returns for 10 years | 178.20 | 31.81 | 560% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement