Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs STRLX
FSMDX vs STRLX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs STRLX
FSMDX vs STRLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. STRLX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and STRLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 52.1B vs. STRLX (54.3M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than STRLX: FSMDX (0.76) vs STRLX (0.32). FSMDX was incepted earlier than STRLX: FSMDX (15 years) vs STRLX (11 years). STRLX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). STRLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.39 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than STRLX: FSMDX (0) vs STRLX (1000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.53 vs. STRLX (8.81). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 47.15 vs. STRLX (-15.96).
| FSMDX | STRLX | FSMDX / STRLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.17 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.17 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.736 | 19.898 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.1B | 54.3M | 95,948% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.32 | 241% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.53 | 8.81 | 244% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.59 | 6.87 | 926% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.15 | -15.96 | -295% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.80 | 22.17 | 752% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers