Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs STRLX
FSMDX vs STRLX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs STRLX
FSMDX vs STRLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. STRLX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and STRLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. STRLX (50.8M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than STRLX: FSMDX (0.75) vs STRLX (0.32). FSMDX was incepted earlier than STRLX: FSMDX (15 years) vs STRLX (11 years). STRLX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). STRLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.39 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than STRLX: FSMDX (0) vs STRLX (1000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.26 vs. STRLX (-0.84). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. STRLX (-20.56).
| FSMDX | STRLX | FSMDX / STRLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.17 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.17 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.837 | 12.840 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 50.8M | 104,528% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.32 | 232% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.26 | -0.84 | -1,586% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.18 | -0.68 | -8,209% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.31 | -20.56 | -196% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.00 | 18.99 | 879% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers