Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs STRNX
FSMDX vs STRNX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs STRNX
FSMDX vs STRNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. STRNX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and STRNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. STRNX (50.8M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than STRNX: FSMDX (0.75) vs STRNX (0.19). FSMDX was incepted earlier than STRNX: FSMDX (15 years) vs STRNX (11 years). STRNX (1.92) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). STRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.39 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than STRNX: FSMDX (0) vs STRNX (1000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.26 vs. STRNX (-2.10). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. STRNX (-25.10).
| FSMDX | STRNX | FSMDX / STRNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.92 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.92 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.837 | 12.256 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 50.8M | 104,528% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.19 | 396% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.26 | -2.10 | -633% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.18 | -4.38 | -1,281% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.31 | -25.10 | -161% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.00 | 8.03 | 2,079% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement