Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs TLVCX
FSMDX vs TLVCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs TLVCX
FSMDX vs TLVCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. TLVCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and TLVCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. TLVCX (304M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than TLVCX: FSMDX (0.75) vs TLVCX (0.32). FSMDX was incepted earlier than TLVCX: FSMDX (15 years) vs TLVCX (23 years). TLVCX (2.32) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). TLVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TLVCX: FSMDX (0) vs TLVCX (1000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.26 vs. TLVCX (-7.51). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. TLVCX (-9.16).
| FSMDX | TLVCX | FSMDX / TLVCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.16 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.32 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.837 | 7.042 | 196% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 304M | 17,467% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.32 | 231% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.26 | -7.51 | -177% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.18 | 1.61 | 3,479% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.31 | -9.16 | -440% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.00 | 8.17 | 2,043% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers