Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs TMAPX
FSMDX vs TMAPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs TMAPX
FSMDX vs TMAPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. TMAPX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and TMAPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 40.4B vs. TMAPX (5.46B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than TMAPX: FSMDX (1.14) vs TMAPX (0.04). FSMDX was incepted earlier than TMAPX: FSMDX (14 years) vs TMAPX (18 years). TMAPX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). TMAPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMAPX: FSMDX (0) vs TMAPX (2500). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.59 vs. TMAPX (3.69). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 81.13 vs. TMAPX (55.44).
| FSMDX | TMAPX | FSMDX / TMAPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.17 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.17 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.368 | 0.037 | 11,830% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.4B | 5.46B | 740% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 0.04 | 3,029% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.59 | 3.69 | 368% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.66 | 32.11 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.13 | 55.44 | 146% |
| Returns for 10 years | 118.59 | 116.19 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement