Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs TMAPX
FSMDX vs TMAPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs TMAPX
FSMDX vs TMAPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. TMAPX commentary
Jul 07, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and TMAPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.2B vs. TMAPX (4.49B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than TMAPX: FSMDX (0.76) vs TMAPX (0.01). FSMDX was incepted earlier than TMAPX: FSMDX (15 years) vs TMAPX (19 years). TMAPX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). FSMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. TMAPX (12.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMAPX: FSMDX (0) vs TMAPX (2500). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.40 vs. TMAPX (4.08). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 44.60 vs. TMAPX (21.40).
| FSMDX | TMAPX | FSMDX / TMAPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.18 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.18 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.326 | 4.158 | 369% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.2B | 4.49B | 1,185% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.01 | 5,755% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.40 | 4.08 | 476% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.37 | 22.43 | 256% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.60 | 21.40 | 208% |
| Returns for 10 years | 170.81 | 133.05 | 128% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement