Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs TMAPX
FSMDX vs TMAPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs TMAPX
FSMDX vs TMAPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. TMAPX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and TMAPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. TMAPX (3.32B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than TMAPX: FSMDX (0.75) vs TMAPX (0.01). FSMDX was incepted earlier than TMAPX: FSMDX (15 years) vs TMAPX (19 years). TMAPX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). FSMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. TMAPX (12.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMAPX: FSMDX (0) vs TMAPX (2500). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.94 vs. TMAPX (3.08). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 42.85 vs. TMAPX (21.19).
| FSMDX | TMAPX | FSMDX / TMAPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.18 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.18 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.895 | 2.412 | 659% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 3.32B | 1,597% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.01 | 5,680% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.94 | 3.08 | 551% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.17 | 20.94 | 283% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.85 | 21.19 | 202% |
| Returns for 10 years | 170.90 | 124.00 | 138% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement