Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs TMCJX
FSMDX vs TMCJX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs TMCJX
FSMDX vs TMCJX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. TMCJX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and TMCJX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 40.4B vs. TMCJX (5.44B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than TMCJX: FSMDX (1.14) vs TMCJX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than TMCJX: FSMDX (14 years) vs TMCJX (18 years). TMCJX (1.91) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). TMCJX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMCJX: FSMDX (0) vs TMCJX (2500). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.60 vs. TMCJX (2.15). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 79.09 vs. TMCJX (48.10).
| FSMDX | TMCJX | FSMDX / TMCJX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.91 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.91 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.198 | -0.982 | -326% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.4B | 5.44B | 742% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.60 | 2.15 | 586% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.70 | 26.40 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.09 | 48.10 | 164% |
| Returns for 10 years | 116.87 | 97.73 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers