Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs TMCJX
FSMDX vs TMCJX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs TMCJX
FSMDX vs TMCJX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. TMCJX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and TMCJX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. TMCJX (3.21B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than TMCJX: FSMDX (0.75) vs TMCJX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than TMCJX: FSMDX (15 years) vs TMCJX (19 years). TMCJX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). FSMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. TMCJX (12.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMCJX: FSMDX (0) vs TMCJX (2500). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.26 vs. TMCJX (-2.82). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. TMCJX (12.45).
| FSMDX | TMCJX | FSMDX / TMCJX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.93 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.93 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.837 | -1.309 | -1,057% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 3.21B | 1,655% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.26 | -2.82 | -471% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.18 | 14.05 | 400% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.31 | 12.45 | 324% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.00 | 99.57 | 168% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement